I suppose that’s it. I’d
rather have written a more massive volume, but my story is finished
for now. Perhaps my wife or daughter will add on an extra chapter to
let people know that I died smiling, or fighting to the end, or
something. If anything, this little book/blog is too
long, stretched out by details of the life of a rude man you don’t
know, but will maybe meet in Heaven.
Jesus said that in Heaven we’ll
be like angels in the sense that they don’t marry. So how are you
going to find me in Heaven? Look up the Goldberg mansion in the
Heaven Yellow Pages? Perhaps we’ll have tea in my parlor and you’ll
tell me you read my testimony. But now perhaps, assuming it’s say
50 years from now we’ll stroll down a few corridors to Diana’s
wing for a little visit and maybe more tea. True, we’re not married
anymore, but somehow we wound up in the same building. Diana’s
parlor is much larger than mine as she had to put up with my
shenanigans in life. Now she’s even got angels attending her, some
of which are preparing our children’s 'wings' for when they
join us (yes I know we won't really have wings). Then we’ll all watch some 3-D colorized rerun’s of the
Nelson’s or the Cleaver’s on HTV. Or maybe our 'mansions' in
Heaven are purely metaphorical. Either way, we get to spend eternity
in paradise.
The thing that amazes me is that
for all our advanced technology we really don’t have any idea,
beyond the clues left for us in the Bible by G-d, of what the
afterlife will really be like. Dante’s fiction and the flick “It’s
A Wonderful Life” have shaped a lot of what we believe as a race.
Then there are the so-called 'near-death experiences' that form
images in our minds. But since none of those folks actually died, we
can’t know if they truly glimpsed Heaven or not. Maybe it was all
in their minds. Perhaps you think my own experiences were
drug-induced psychoses. How would you know? How much can we truly
know for sure about any spiritual things?
Well, we can know a lot actually.
The events of the life of Jesus are among the best documented in
History. Of course it still takes faith to believe, but not 'blind' faith. There is plenty of evidence available for those with eyes to
see. Authors C.S. Lewis and Josh McDowell both tried to disprove the
Bible but wound up believers in the process.
Whether or not there are physical
mansions or merely clouds, I know that Heaven is going to be great.
Jesus is going to be there...
Addendum
Is Jesus qualified to be the
Messiah?
To
the Christian, Jesus is obviously the Messiah, having fulfilled all
Bible prophesy concerning Him (except of course for Second Coming
prophesies as yet unfulfilled). For example He was born in Bethlehem
and is a descendant of David. That probably describes quite a few
Jewish people. But Jesus’ death is described in the book of Isaiah,
dying for the sins of others with not a bone broken, with His
appearance marred. That narrows it down quite a bit. There are
upwards of 70 Bible prophecies fulfilled by His first coming. It is
mathematically impossible that Jesus is not the Messiah, if someone
approaches the Bible with an open mind and heart.
Non-believing
(in Jesus) Jews approach the Bible with certain pre-conceived
beliefs, most notably that Jesus is not and can’t possibly be the
Messiah. They can then look at passages such as Isaiah 53 and say
that therefore, this can’t possibly be a description of Jesus, but
rather must be a description of Israel. But Israel did not die for
the sins of others without a bone broken. How often have you read the
Word and thought that Jesus is so obviously Messiah, why can’t the
Jews see it? I’m sure there are books written on this subject and
it’s not my intention to publish a book on theology, nor am I
qualified to.
I
would, however, like to bring up one Jewish argument, having to do
with the genealogies in Matthew and Luke. Matthew’s line includes
the accursed Jeconiah (Jeremiah 22:30), so if Joseph was Yeshua’s
biological father, it’s true that Jesus would be disqualified. But
we know that He is the offspring of the Holy Spirit. Mary’s
genealogy in Luke also traces her line back to David but not through
Jeconiah. In the books of Samuel and Chronicles, it is written that
the Messiah will come through Solomon. Mary’s line is traced
through Nathan, not Solomon. Some Christians have said that since
Joseph was Yeshua’s legal father, having adopted Him, but not His
biological father, that it’s OK to use Joseph’s line which goes
through Solomon. But it’s unnecessary to do this and knowledgeable
Jews will reject this idea.
The
answer is simply that G-d rejected the line of Solomon to bring forth
the Messiah as His promise to Solomon was conditional upon his
keeping G-d’s statutes and judgments (1 Chronicles 28:5-7), and
serving G-d with a perfect heart and not forsaking Him (1 Chron.
28:9). In 1Kings 11:9-13 G-d says that Solomon hasn’t kept His
statutes and judgments and that the Kingdom will be taken away from
him. The changing of the Kingdom from Solomon’s branch to another
branch is prophesied in Jeremiah 23:5-6; “the days are coming when
I will raise a righteous branch unto David and a king will reign and
prosper”. And so the Messiah came from the line of Nathan. Please
see my short bibliography for more information.
Who killed Jesus, the Romans or the Jews?
They
both played their parts, but neither is ultimately responsible.
John
10:17-18 “I lay down my life that I may take it again. No one takes
it from me; I lay it down myself. I have power to lay it down and
take it again. I received this command from my Father.”
Isaiah
53:10 “It pleased the L-rd to bruise Him.”
Isaiah
53:12b “He suffered for the sins of many, and interceded for
rebels”.
Jesus
came to die as G-d’s plan to save you. He loves you that much.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Arnold
Fruchtenbaum – Messianic Christology
Arnold
Fruchtenbaum – Footsteps of the Messiah
Both
available at www.ariel.org
Solomon
vs. Nathan, the Jewish perspective:
http://www.sullivan-county.com/identity/gen_jesus.htm
Solomon
vs. Nathan, the Christian perspective:
http://www.bibletoday.com/V5/Study_06.html
No comments:
Post a Comment